Outsource Bookkeeping Service Providers

  • Accounting
  • Bookkeeping
  • US Taxation
  • Financial Planning
  • Accounting Software
  • Small Business Finance
You are here: Home / Financial Planning / Editor’s Column: Shorter lifespans require pension re-think

Editor’s Column: Shorter lifespans require pension re-think

January 14, 2022 by cbn Leave a Comment

FP Today Editor Kevin O'Donnell

It’s been an accepted wisdom over the past few decades that we are all living longer, at least as a nation. That’s now being tested.

There are several factors causing a slowdown in the long term trend of longer lifespans and Coronavirus is just one of them.

Obesity, substance abuse, poorer lifestyles, long waits for medical treatment and so on are other factors but Covid has been a major recent factor.

The expectation that we will all live longer is no longer as assured as it was and that needs to reflected in pensions, particularly the State Pension.

The pandemic is far from over and it’s too early to predict its lasting effects but a large number of people have sadly lost their lives and this already appears to be reducing average life expectancy, particularly in some areas of the UK.

The British Medical Journal reported in September that: “The Covid-19 pandemic led to the biggest year-on-year drop in life expectancy in England since statistics were first collected in 1981, Public Health England has said. In 2020, the agency said that “the very high level” of excess deaths because of the pandemic caused life expectancy in England to fall 1.3 years for men to 78.7 and 0.9 years for women to 82.7. This was the lowest life expectancy in England for both sexes since 2011.”

At the same time, as Financial Planning Today reported this week, the government has been continuing to purse its policy of steadily raising the State Pension retirement age and is even considering bringing forward some of the age increases in State Pension Age, or to put it another way, pushing back further the age when many will get their State Pension.

{loadposition hidden2}

A rise in life expectancy leading to a steady rise in State Pension Age has some logic and common sense behind it, albeit it’s not something most people nearing retirement with modest provision would relish.

The State Pension is, of course, funded by taxpayers so there has to be some element of restricting its cost to ensure younger taxpayers are not over-burdened. That’s a difficult balancing act to get right.

However, continuing to push up the State Pension Age when people are actually dying younger smacks of an almost cruel policy, effectively moving the finishing line further and further away for pension savers.

To be fair, it’s early days for all this. The fall in average life expectancy may be a temporary blip, we just do not know. It does seem likely, however, that we are in for a bumpy few years on life expectancy and the government, certainly the Government Actuary’s Department, will have to take the changes into account.

To be trusted, respected and worthwhile the State Pension Age must be fair to all. For hundreds of thousands, or even millions, to face never receiving a State Pension they have paid into all their lives, while those in better health who live longer gain the most, makes no sense at all. Reform is needed.

Analysis of the latest ONS figures by pension consultancy LCP, for men and women currently at pension age, suggests their life expectancy is now two years shorter than previously thought.

While the State Pension age has increased rapidly in recent years, LCP partner and former Pensions Minister Steve Webb, says the latest data reinforces the case for a fundamental rethink of the timetable for increasing State Pension ages.

Many, including fellow former Pensions Minister and pensions campaigner Baroness Ros Altmann, have also called for a review. The calls for change are growing.

On current trends the State Pension system risks becoming increasingly unfair, particularly to some of the poorest in our society, those both poor in income and in health.

A system that may provide the option of a lower pension payment earlier for those most in need makes some kind of sense. A review of inexorable rises in the State Pension Age is also required.

• If you have not yet registered for Financial Planning Today as a subscriber please do so now. It’s free to sign up and you get access to up to 10 free articles a month with the option to upgrade for unlimited access. Access to stories will be restricted without registration. Registration takes 30 seconds, just click on a couple of stories to see the Registration box. If you are already registered there is no need to re-register.


Kevin O’Donnell is editor of Financial Planning Today and a journalist with 40 years of experience in finance, business and mainstream news. This topical comment on the Financial Planning news appears most weeks, usually on Fridays but occasionally other days. Follow @FPT_Kevin 

 

{loadmoduleid 444}

Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedinShare on Pinterest

Filed Under: Financial Planning

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archives

  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015

Recent Posts

  • FSCS steps in as fifth credit union fails 
  • The Gamification Of Monte Carlo: How To Incentivize Proactive (Not Reactive) Retirement Spending Goals
  • Aviva claims top slot for adviser platform 
  • Aussie fintech firm launches family-focused platform in the U.S.
  • Your Step-by-step Accounts Receivable Process Guide

Recent Comments

    Categories

    • Accounting
    • Accounting Software
    • Bookkeeping
    • Financial Planning
    • Small Business Finance
    • Uncategorized
    • US Taxation

    Categories

    • Accounting (1,429)
    • Accounting Software (1,377)
    • Bookkeeping (1,408)
    • Financial Planning (2,539)
    • Small Business Finance (1)
    • Uncategorized (3,136)
    • US Taxation (462)

    Subscribe Our Newsletter

     Subscribing I accept the privacy rules of this site

    Copyright © 2022 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in